1. Product Overview and Market Positioning
The Lexar NM620 (model variants: LNM620X001T-RNNNU for 1TB) is a PCIe Gen3 x4 NVMe SSD launched in March 2021, targeting budget-conscious gamers, content creators, and PC upgraders. Positioned as an entry-level performance drive, it promises sequential speeds up to 3,300 MB/s read and 3,000 MB/s write (for 1TB/2TB models), leveraging NVMe 1.4 technology and 3D TLC NAND.
2. Technical Specifications
Core Hardware
-
Controller: InnoGrit IG5216 (Shasta+), rebranded as Lexar DM620 512.
-
NAND Flash: Micron 96-layer 3D TLC (B27B FortisFlash) or YMTC TLC variants .
-
Form Factor: M.2 2280 (single-sided design) .
-
Capacities: 256GB, 512GB, 1TB, 2TB .
-
Interface: PCIe 3.0 x4 (NVMe 1.4) .
Performance Metrics
Table: Performance by Capacity 15
| Capacity | Seq. Read | Seq. Write | Random Read | Random Write | TBW |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 256GB | 3,000 MB/s | 1,300 MB/s | 92K IOPS | 240K IOPS | 125 TB |
| 512GB | 3,300 MB/s | 2,400 MB/s | 200K IOPS | 256K IOPS | 250 TB |
| 1TB | 3,300 MB/s | 3,000 MB/s | 300K IOPS | 256K IOPS | 500 TB |
| 2TB | 3,500 MB/s | 3,000 MB/s | 350K IOPS | 256K IOPS | 1,000 TB |
Endurance and Reliability
-
Endurance: Modest for TLC NAND (e.g., 500TBW for 1TB vs. 600TBW for WD Blue SN550) .
-
Warranty: 5-year limited .
-
Error Correction: LDPC (Low-Density Parity Check) for data integrity .
-
Durability: Shock-resistant (1,500G) and vibration-resistant (20G) .
3. Performance Deep Dive
Strengths
-
Sequential Speeds: Near-advertised read/write in CrystalDiskMark (e.g., 3,223 MB/s read, 2,301 MB/s write for 512GB) .
-
SLC Cache: Dynamic ~208GB cache (1TB model) absorbs bursts; initial writes hit 2.5 GB/s before dropping .
-
4K Writes: Competent random write performance (256K IOPS) 6.
-
Real-World Use: Handles game loads and OS boot efficiently; 6× faster than SATA SSDs .
Weaknesses
-
Sustained Writes: Post-cache speeds plummet to 800 MB/s (average), collapsing to 140–190 MB/s under heavy loads
-
Random I/O: Poor 4K random read (82K IOPS) and VDI benchmarks (25K IOPS in boot tests) .
-
PCMark 10: Subpar scores in trace-based tests (e.g., Call of Duty load times) .
-
Houdini Rendering: Slow CGI workloads (3,577 seconds vs. competitors’ sub-1,000) .
4. Thermal and Power Efficiency
-
Thermals: Idle at 30–40°C; peaks at 89°C during writes (thermal imaging). Minimal throttling with airflow .
-
Power Management: Optimized for laptops; 20–30% lower consumption vs. HDDs .
-
No Heatsink: Bare PCB design risks throttling in cramped laptops; users should add thermal pads .
5. Endurance and Reliability Concerns
-
Low TBW: 500TBW for 1TB (0.44 DWPD) trails rivals (e.g., Samsung 980: 600TBW) .
-
NAND Quality: Micron B27B TLC rated for 3,000 P/E cycles (conservative vs. industry avg) .
-
No Encryption: Lacks hardware AES encryption .
6. Value Proposition and Competition
Pricing (2025 Refurbished Market)
Competitive Landscape
-
WD Blue SN550: Better sustained writes (1.5 GB/s) and endurance at similar pricing .
-
Samsung 980: Superior random I/O and 13¢/GB value.
-
Intel 670p (QLC): Comparable endurance but weaker writes .
Target Audience
-
Budget Gamers: Adequate for game libraries (fast load times in SLC cache) .
-
Casual Users: Office tasks, web browsing, light content creation .
-
Avoid For: 4K video editing, database workloads, or sustained write scenarios .
7. Controversies and Hardware Variants
-
Inconsistent Performance: Users report drastic speed variances (e.g., 3,481 MB/s read vs. 850 MB/s in professional tests) due to:
-
NAND/Controller Mix: Micron/YMTC flash and MAP1202/IG5216 controllers 512.
-
Firmware Issues: Early revisions (V1.8) had optimization flaws 6.
-
-
“Spectacular Fail” Claims: StorageReview dubbed it a failure for intensive workloads after ranking last in 9/10 benchmarks .
8. Verdict: A Budget Warrior with Caveats
The Lexar NM620 excels as a cost-effective upgrade from SATA SSDs or HDDs, delivering solid sequential speeds and solid burst performance for casual use. Its 5-year warranty and shock resistance add reliability points. However, severe limitations in sustained writes, random I/O, and endurance make it unsuitable for professional workloads.








There are no reviews yet.